Though everyone has known about it for years, the NYTimes threw a little light on how sucking doesn’t suck.
I am a UB fan through and through, so to be honest, seeing the team on the front page of the times was more cause for excitement than it was for despair. They didn’t report anything that UB’s student newspaper, the Spectrum, by way of the Buffalo News, didn’t report months ago.
What strikes me about the whole situation is how fatalistic everyone is about all this stuff – for me, it just shows how big a joke college football is. If you’re not rooting for a top 25 team, it’s hardly worth it to follow your team. If you root for a top-25 team, you just watch your scumbag players either bolt for the NFL or get arrested or something else stupid. If you’re fortunate to root for a middling team, like a top-of-the-MAC squad like Toledo or something, you might be in the best shape as a football fan. It’s depressing.
But, if you’re going to be a UB football fan, you have to take the pill – BuffaloRox put it best in his comments on Buffalo Pundit:
The article clearly explains why UB or any struggling program, would play a football powerhouse against overwhelming odds of winning. It might be a strategy that you don’t agree with. However, following a strategy employed by others (e.g., Bobby Bowden per the article) doesn’t strike me as irrational.
Basically, it sucks to suck, but at least there’s the hope of hope.
I know ethically it’s not any better, but at least college basketball has the redeeming quality of being unpredictable – you don’t get Valpo – or even UB – stories in football.



